Home->Operating system

64-bit And A Day Later…

Monday, 27th October 2008

Yes I finally bit the bullet and went 64-bit.

For one thing, it sucks that there’s no 64-bit browser plug-in support in Sun’s JAVA Runtimes. That means I still have to fall back to the normal, 32-bit Firefox and IEs. Not that there’s anything wrong with them, but since I’m on 64-bit I’d prefer to use native 64-bit stuff, you know? Installing the 64-bit version of the JRE is pretty pointless on a PC, unless you’re doing development work. All other software you have will probably run fine on 32-bit version of the JRE.

First of all, many people have said that the PC will “slow down” when running 32-bit software because it’s not native. My reply – no difference. It’s the same as your standard Windows XP trying to run a DOS program (16-bit). If you didn’t find your DOS program “slowing down”, you won’t find 32-bit software “slowing down” on your 64-bit OS.

There were some hoops I had to jump through to install some stuff, though. Be warned. For example, Windows Live Photo Gallery, part of the Windows Live suite of programs, refused to install, claiming that WinXP 64 was unsupported. Luckily, I found a workaround and installed it anyway and it runs fine. The trick is to get the actual MSI file and bypass Microsoft’s retarded installer. Yes, it’s 32-bit but it runs fine.

The big test was of course, my games. If any of my games refused to run on x64, you can bet I’ll reformat back to bog-standard Windows XP. Fortunately, they ran fine.

So in conclusion, I guess I’m staying with WinXP x64 then. I have yet to encounter any application that can’t be run on 64-bit Windows XP. As far as I am concerned, 100% of whatever I use run fine. It’s just too bad that there’s no 64-bit version of some of the software I’d like to have, like Gimp.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share

Do I Want To Go 64-bit?

Tuesday, 21st October 2008

Windows XP

Image via Wikipedia

Recently I added 2 more gigs of RAM to my new PC, and totally forgot about the 4GB limit of Windows XP. So the end result is, while I may have 4GBs of RAM physically, only 3.25GB is visible in WinXP. No amount of fiddling around with BIOS and WinXP boot options “fixed” it. It is a limitation of normal, standard, 32-bit Windows XP.

So, I am now in a small dilemma – do I move on to Windows XP 64-bit?

And for those of you who are going to suggest Vista, save it. Not interested. I’ve always only upgraded my OS to the next version if, and only if, my games demanded it. Otherwise, I’ll just stay with the current version. Moving to Windows XP 64 bit is technically not “upgrading” to me. It’s just using a slightly different version of the same OS.

The only reservation I have right now about this move is that I might run into a game which may not work. However, AMD 64-bit CPUs have been out for awhile now, and I don’t really see gamers denouncing AMD or anything. So, I guess my fears may be unfounded.

In fact, I have been doing some “research”. I have been downloading all the 64-bit versions of everything that I can lay my hands on – graphic drivers, sound drivers, LAN drivers etc… all to prepare for the day (which may actually be today) that I do decide to reformat and install WinXP64.

The thing is, it’s hard to locate 64-bit versions for stuff like anti-virus, firewalls, etc which aren’t drivers, but equally important for the security and well-being of the PC. Well my primary concern is actually the anti-virus rather than the firewall. I’ve been using the one in the router and also the native WinXP one for so long, that I don’t really need something “better”.

So, I am still trying to decide if I should take the plunge…

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Bookmark and Share