Comments on: Testing My New ATI 4650 On COD4 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154 A Singaporean Gamer Geek's journey into the world of Games Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:25:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: r4 nintendo ds http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-10 r4 nintendo ds Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:09:48 +0000 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154#comment-10 I'd be lost without ATI 4650. I use ATI 4650 often. I'd be lost without ATI 4650. I'd be lost without ATI 4650. I use ATI 4650 often. I'd be lost without ATI 4650.

]]> By: FoxTwo http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-14 FoxTwo Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:13:32 +0000 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154#comment-14 $120 in which currency? If it's US$, it's too expensive for me. I'm on a very TIGHT budget.<br><br>Besides, I just bought this card. There is no way I am buying another card just becos it's "better" less than a year of getting this one. $120 in which currency? If it's US$, it's too expensive for me. I'm on a very TIGHT budget.

Besides, I just bought this card. There is no way I am buying another card just becos it's “better” less than a year of getting this one.

]]> By: Graphics http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-13 Graphics Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:36:07 +0000 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154#comment-13 Get the 4850, it's only $120ish now which is a bargain. It is SIGNIFICANTLY better than the 4650.<br><br>4870 > 4850 > 4830 > 3870 > 3850 > 4670 > 4650 > etc<br><br>You can play Crysis on high at 1280x1024 with the ATI4850, and get about 50fps average. With the 4650, you'll get maybe 10 fps average. Get the 4850, it's only $120ish now which is a bargain. It is SIGNIFICANTLY better than the 4650.

4870 > 4850 > 4830 > 3870 > 3850 > 4670 > 4650 > etc

You can play Crysis on high at 1280×1024 with the ATI4850, and get about 50fps average. With the 4650, you'll get maybe 10 fps average.

]]> By: Graphics http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-11 Graphics Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:34:03 +0000 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154#comment-11 yeh...a 4830 gets about 60fps on average at your resolution and gfx settings, and a 4850 gets 80-90 average. A 4870 gets over 100 fps on average.<br><br>You could've also bought a 4670, only $10 more than a 4650 but 30-40% better performance. yeh…a 4830 gets about 60fps on average at your resolution and gfx settings, and a 4850 gets 80-90 average. A 4870 gets over 100 fps on average.

You could've also bought a 4670, only $10 more than a 4650 but 30-40% better performance.

]]> By: FoxTwo http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-15 FoxTwo Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:00:24 +0000 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154#comment-15 Heh why not, since the 4650 is almost like a "value" card now.. for the amount of money, you really get a LOT for it. Note that I haven't even mucked around with overclocking the thing yet - it's still at the default factory setting of 600/400Mhz for GPU and Memory... Heh why not, since the 4650 is almost like a “value” card now.. for the amount of money, you really get a LOT for it. Note that I haven't even mucked around with overclocking the thing yet – it's still at the default factory setting of 600/400Mhz for GPU and Memory…

]]> By: Chris http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154&cpage=1#comment-12 Chris Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:46:02 +0000 http://shades.foxtwo.org/?p=154#comment-12 I'm wavering between buying this 4650 card or paying twice as much for the 4850, for twice the price. I'm thinking the best value would be the 4650. Especially considering I'm taking the leap from the 1600XT. Hah. Almost embarrassed to admit that :) I'm wavering between buying this 4650 card or paying twice as much for the 4850, for twice the price. I'm thinking the best value would be the 4650. Especially considering I'm taking the leap from the 1600XT. Hah. Almost embarrassed to admit that :)

]]>